She is more likely to defend her corporate employers than the media people. Nira Radia is being questioned by the authorities. If you believe in the material you have, then use your own forum and the processes that civil society grants you. He just wanted to know why it was not covered on NDTV when Barkha Dutt was privy to so much information.ĭid any of the panelists believe that they would get an answer? By becoming a part of the show they have in fact lost at least partially any independent thinking. Is that the reason why the editor insisted that he has not accused Barkha Dutt of corruption? Then what is the tamasha about? Lobbying? Media ethics? He did not accuse her of these. No mobile phones and 2G dreams? What if…? The group has diverse business interests, owning more than twenty companies in areas like tyre manufacture, power transmission, IT, retail, entertainment, carbon black and life sciences. The RPG group is one of India’s fastest growing-conglomerates, owning premium brands like Ceat Tyres, SareGaMa and Spencer’s, with a turnover touching Rs 14,000 crore. There is no need to be apologetic about that, but Open is owned by RPG Enterprises. And it comes in a new size-more than an inch wider than the standard A4 size of most magazines-giving the reader more content and the advertiser more ad space.Īll this make it essential to have content that sells. The clean, vibrant packaging and uncluttered presentation adds to the international look. What does it plan to do next? Does anyone know? When there is a lot of noise about the mainstream media, on what grounds is Open considered non-mainstream? Here is what the magazine’s site says about itself: The error of judgment is not realising that these things would backfire.Ĥ. If she was just listening to Radia’s appeals and playing along, then she is not naïve at all. The possibility of talking to them is clearly stated. Yet, she told Manu Joseph that he did not know about political journalism! If we take her word for it, then why did she trust Nira Radia again and again? Politicians are mentioned. Barkha Dutt said that all she can be accused of is ‘an error of judgment’ and ‘naivete’. This is her opinion and there were several other subsidiaries that could have been asked to pin down this same point.ģ. She responded that no one can decide about what story should be covered by whom. It is a valid poser that has been raised by quite a few people, so there was nothing new. His insistence that Barkha should answer the question about why she did not do a story based on the conversations began to sound extremely churlish. This brings us to Manu Joseph of Open Magazine that was the first to carry the transcripts of the tapes. Sanjaya Baru of Business Standard tried to discuss the Radia tapes but insisted that ethics was a different issue. Swapan Dasgupta first talked about how he was always pre-judged, which sort of sent out a little message of empathy, but since he had to be independent he made some noises this man has been a hardcore Hindutva supporter and now in his role as a TOI person he has gone soft overtly. What does independent panelists mean? Are they independent of the channel? Are they independent in their views? Are they independent of any association with any of the people involved in the controversy? Are they independent of their own organisations? All of them are from the media.ĭileep Padgaongar went into his intellectual foreplay and he does seem far better equipped to discuss the finer aspects of French cuisine. No one, not even Manu Joseph the whistle-blower, could make a logical argument.Ģ. This show was a farce not because of the emotions, which are natural, but because of several other reasons:ġ. They should have continued with that belief. The host, Sonia Singh, started by saying that they had earlier wanted someone else to ask Barkha because they believed in a level-playing field. Barkha Dutt came on her own show to answer questions by an independent panel on a channel in which she is the group editor. I had avoided taking specific names in an earlier article here because it was taking away from the issue and it would have only confirmed my point about buffering a cult. First thought: what were they thinking? It does not take long to figure out that what I had expected has happened: The ‘lynch mob’ is now the ‘give-the-benefit-of-doubt mob’. It happened to be an ad for DHL couriers. The video showed an image with the words, “This is not an envelope.” I geared up for the expose. Last night I did not watch ‘The Buck Stops Here’ on NDTV.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |